Which Dividend Stock Is Better: Energy Transfer or Enterprise Products?

December 12, 2024

Investors seeking reliable dividend income often turn to the midstream energy sector, where companies like Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners stand out. Both firms have a significant presence in North America, but deciding which one offers a better dividend stock can be a challenging endeavor. This article delves into several key aspects, including distribution reliability, historical performance, management decisions, and financial health, to help investors make an informed choice. Through a comprehensive analysis of these facets, we aim to present a clearer picture of which company is the superior option for dividend-focused investments.

Distribution Reliability

A key factor for income investors is the consistency and reliability of distributions. Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners have different track records in this regard. Energy Transfer’s decision to cut its distribution by 50% in 2020, from $1.22 to $0.61 per unit per quarter, was a significant move during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cut, while perhaps necessary for business continuity, had a severe impact on income investors who relied on these distributions. The company’s approach was seen as a reactive measure taken to safeguard the business amid unprecedented economic disruptions caused by the pandemic.

In contrast, Enterprise Products Partners has demonstrated remarkable consistency. The company has managed to increase its distribution every year for the past 26 years, even during challenging periods like 2020. This unwavering commitment to distribution growth highlights the company’s ability to maintain stability and trust among its investors through thick and thin. For income investors who depend on stable and predictable returns from their investments, this level of reliability is crucial. The continuous distribution growth amidst global challenges underlines Enterprise’s strong operational and financial management.

Historical Performance

Examining the historical performance of both companies provides insights into their resilience and reliability. Energy Transfer’s 2020 distribution cut is a notable example of how external pressures can impact investor returns. Additionally, the aborted merger with Williams Companies in 2016, which cost Energy Transfer nearly $500 million, raised concerns about the management’s decision-making and its impact on unitholders. This event underscored the vulnerability of Energy Transfer to strategic missteps and external market pressures, leading to financial strain and a lack of confidence among investors.

On the other hand, Enterprise Products Partners has a history of weathering economic downturns without cutting distributions. This track record of stability and growth over 26 years highlights the company’s commitment to its unitholders and its ability to navigate market challenges effectively. The absence of major financial missteps and consistent performance through variable market conditions has cemented Enterprise’s reputation as a reliable income stock. Their methodical approach to sustaining and incrementing distributions showcases the company’s intrinsic strength and alignment with investor interests.

Management Decisions

The strategies and decisions made by the management teams of both companies play a crucial role in their performance and reliability. Energy Transfer’s management faced criticism for its 2016 decision to issue convertible securities to its then-CEO, protecting him from potential losses due to a dividend cut. This move, coupled with the costly aborted merger, raised questions about the prioritization of unitholder interests. Such decisions have fueled skepticism regarding the motivations and alignment of Energy Transfer’s executive team with its investors, marking a noticeable contrast in strategy compared to its peers.

In contrast, Enterprise Products Partners’ management has shown a strong alignment with unitholder interests. The company’s decision to self-fund more of its capital projects, thereby reducing the need to issue additional units and minimizing dilution risks, exemplifies its commitment to maintaining a stable and sustainable distribution model. This strategic financial management underscores the company’s dedication to supporting its investors effectively. By avoiding excessive dilution and executing sound financial plans, Enterprise upholds a favorable image among its unitholders and reflects responsible corporate stewardship.

Financial Health

Financial stability is a critical aspect of a company’s ability to sustain distributions and fund future growth. Energy Transfer’s financial decisions, including the 2020 distribution cut and the 2016 aborted merger, have raised concerns about its financial health and management practices. These actions have led to doubts about the company’s ability to prioritize investor interests consistently. The company’s overall strategies and fiscal outcomes suggest a level of unpredictability, which could be worrisome for those seeking consistent income from their investments.

Enterprise Products Partners, on the other hand, boasts an investment grade-rated balance sheet and a robust distribution coverage ratio of 1.7 times. This significant margin of safety ensures greater financial stability and highlights the company’s prudent financial management. By enhancing its financial structure and ensuring dependable distribution growth, Enterprise Products Partners demonstrates a strong commitment to unitholder value. The investment-grade rating and healthy balance sheets solidify its stature as a secure choice in the midstream energy sector, providing consistent dividends backed by sound financial health.

Unitholder Focus

Investors looking for steady dividend income often focus on the midstream energy sector, with companies like Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners being notable contenders. Both have a strong presence in North America, but determining which one is the better dividend stock can prove to be a difficult task. This article examines various crucial elements such as distribution reliability, past performance, management choices, and financial stability to aid investors in making a well-informed decision.

We provide a thorough analysis of these factors to help present a clearer comparison, guiding you towards the firm that might offer a superior option for dividend-centric investments. By evaluating the historical and current performance, as well as the decisions and financial strategies employed by both companies, investors can gain more insight into which company stands out more as a reliable dividend stock. This comprehensive analysis aims to help investors select the more promising and stable dividend option between Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later